news 2026/7/5 1:05:51

Day 39 信贷数据集神经网络训练

作者头像

张小明

前端开发工程师

1.2k 24
文章封面图
Day 39 信贷数据集神经网络训练

文章目录

  • Day 39 · 信贷数据集神经网络训练
    • 一、数据预处理
    • 二、构建 DataLoader 与神经网络
    • 三、可视化
      • Dropout 模型表现
    • 四、小结

Day 39 · 信贷数据集神经网络训练

importpandasaspdimportnumpyasnpimporttorchimporttorch.nnasnnimporttorch.optimasoptimimportmatplotlib.pyplotaspltfromsklearn.model_selectionimporttrain_test_splitimportwarningsimportrandom warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')# 忽略警告信息defset_seed(seed:int=42):random.seed(seed)np.random.seed(seed)torch.manual_seed(seed)torch.cuda.manual_seed_all(seed)torch.backends.cudnn.deterministic=Truetorch.backends.cudnn.benchmark=Falseset_seed(42)data=pd.read_csv('../data.csv')data.head()
IdHome OwnershipAnnual IncomeYears in current jobTax LiensNumber of Open AccountsYears of Credit HistoryMaximum Open CreditNumber of Credit ProblemsMonths since last delinquentBankruptciesPurposeTermCurrent Loan AmountCurrent Credit BalanceMonthly DebtCredit ScoreCredit Default
00Own Home482087.0NaN0.011.026.3685960.01.0NaN1.0debt consolidationShort Term99999999.047386.07914.0749.00
11Own Home1025487.010+ years0.015.015.31181730.00.0NaN0.0debt consolidationLong Term264968.0394972.018373.0737.01
22Home Mortgage751412.08 years0.011.035.01182434.00.0NaN0.0debt consolidationShort Term99999999.0308389.013651.0742.00
33Own Home805068.06 years0.08.022.5147400.01.0NaN1.0debt consolidationShort Term121396.095855.011338.0694.00
44Rent776264.08 years0.013.013.6385836.01.0NaN0.0debt consolidationShort Term125840.093309.07180.0719.00

一、数据预处理

discrete_features=data.select_dtypes(include=['object']).columns.tolist()print(discrete_features)maps={'Home Ownership':{'Own Home':1,'Rent':2,'Have Mortgage':3,'Home Mortgage':4},'Years in current job':{'< 1 year':1,'1 year':2,'2 years':3,'3 years':4,'4 years':5,'5 years':6,'6 years':7,'7 years':8,'8 years':9,'9 years':10,'10+ years':11},'Term':{'Short Term':0,'Long Term':1}}data=data.replace(maps)# Purpose 独热编码,记得需要将bool类型转换为数值data=pd.get_dummies(data,columns=['Purpose'])data2=pd.read_csv('../data.csv')list_diff=data.columns.difference(data2.columns)data[list_diff]=data[list_diff].astype(int)data.rename(columns={'Term':'Long Term'},inplace=True)# 重命名列continuous_features=data.select_dtypes(include=['int64','float64']).columns.tolist()#把筛选出来的列名转换成列表# 连续特征用中位数补全forfeatureincontinuous_features:mode_value=data[feature].mode()[0]#获取该列的众数。data[feature].fillna(mode_value,inplace=True)#用众数填充该列的缺失值,inplace=True表示直接在原数据上修改。X=data.drop(['Credit Default','Id'],axis=1)# 特征,axis=1表示按列删除y=data['Credit Default']# 标签# 按照8:2划分训练集和测试集X_train,X_test,y_train,y_test=train_test_split(X,y,test_size=0.2,random_state=42)# 80%训练集,20%测试集
['Home Ownership', 'Years in current job', 'Purpose', 'Term']
fromsklearn.preprocessingimportStandardScaler scaler=StandardScaler()X_train=scaler.fit_transform(X_train)X_test=scaler.transform(X_test)print(X_train.shape)print(X_test.shape)print(y_train.shape)print(y_test.shape)
(6000, 30) (1500, 30) (6000,) (1500,)

二、构建 DataLoader 与神经网络

  1. train_loadertest_loader设置可选的 pinned memory,方便 GPU 加速。
  2. 在每个 epoch 结束后,对训练集与测试集分别计算损失和准确率,并保存下来用于可视化。
  3. 打印定期的监控日志,便于观察收敛情况。
fromtorch.utils.dataimportDataLoader,TensorDataset device=torch.device('cuda:0'iftorch.cuda.is_available()else'cpu')pin_memory=device.type=='cuda'X_train=torch.FloatTensor(X_train)y_train=torch.FloatTensor(y_train.to_numpy()).unsqueeze(1)X_test=torch.FloatTensor(X_test)y_test=torch.FloatTensor(y_test.to_numpy()).unsqueeze(1)print(X_train.shape)print(X_test.shape)print(y_train.shape)print(y_test.shape)print('---------------------------------')train_dataset=TensorDataset(X_train,y_train)test_dataset=TensorDataset(X_test,y_test)train_loader=DataLoader(train_dataset,batch_size=64,shuffle=True,pin_memory=pin_memory)test_loader=DataLoader(test_dataset,batch_size=256,shuffle=False,pin_memory=pin_memory)model=nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(X_train.shape[1],64),nn.ReLU(),nn.Linear(64,32),nn.ReLU(),nn.Linear(32,1)).to(device)criterion=nn.BCEWithLogitsLoss()optimizer=optim.Adam(model.parameters(),lr=1e-3)num_epochs=300train_losses,test_losses=[],[]train_accuracies,test_accuracies=[],[]forepochinrange(1,num_epochs+1):model.train()running_loss=0.0running_correct=0total_train=0forx_batch,y_batchintrain_loader:x_batch=x_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)y_batch=y_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)optimizer.zero_grad()outputs=model(x_batch)loss=criterion(outputs,y_batch)loss.backward()optimizer.step()running_loss+=loss.item()*x_batch.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(outputs)>0.5).int()running_correct+=(preds==y_batch.int()).sum().item()total_train+=x_batch.size(0)avg_train_loss=running_loss/total_train avg_train_acc=running_correct/total_train train_losses.append(avg_train_loss)train_accuracies.append(avg_train_acc)model.eval()test_loss=0.0test_correct=0total_test=0withtorch.no_grad():forx_batch,y_batchintest_loader:x_batch=x_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)y_batch=y_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)outputs=model(x_batch)loss=criterion(outputs,y_batch)test_loss+=loss.item()*x_batch.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(outputs)>0.5).int()test_correct+=(preds==y_batch.int()).sum().item()total_test+=x_batch.size(0)avg_test_loss=test_loss/total_test avg_test_acc=test_correct/total_test test_losses.append(avg_test_loss)test_accuracies.append(avg_test_acc)ifepoch%20==0orepoch==1:print(f'Epoch [{epoch:03d}/{num_epochs}] | 'f'Train Loss:{avg_train_loss:.4f}, Train Acc:{avg_train_acc:.4f}| 'f'Test Loss:{avg_test_loss:.4f}, Test Acc:{avg_test_acc:.4f}')print(f'Final Test Accuracy:{test_accuracies[-1]:.4f}')
torch.Size([6000, 30]) torch.Size([1500, 30]) torch.Size([6000, 1]) torch.Size([1500, 1]) --------------------------------- Epoch [001/300] | Train Loss: 0.5566, Train Acc: 0.7417 | Test Loss: 0.5053, Test Acc: 0.7673 Epoch [020/300] | Train Loss: 0.4383, Train Acc: 0.7883 | Test Loss: 0.4872, Test Acc: 0.7587 Epoch [040/300] | Train Loss: 0.4183, Train Acc: 0.7990 | Test Loss: 0.4940, Test Acc: 0.7540 Epoch [060/300] | Train Loss: 0.3951, Train Acc: 0.8105 | Test Loss: 0.5158, Test Acc: 0.7500 Epoch [080/300] | Train Loss: 0.3816, Train Acc: 0.8165 | Test Loss: 0.5445, Test Acc: 0.7560 Epoch [100/300] | Train Loss: 0.3640, Train Acc: 0.8263 | Test Loss: 0.5684, Test Acc: 0.7560 Epoch [120/300] | Train Loss: 0.3565, Train Acc: 0.8320 | Test Loss: 0.5776, Test Acc: 0.7220 Epoch [140/300] | Train Loss: 0.3459, Train Acc: 0.8402 | Test Loss: 0.5914, Test Acc: 0.7213 Epoch [160/300] | Train Loss: 0.3373, Train Acc: 0.8432 | Test Loss: 0.6063, Test Acc: 0.7400 Epoch [180/300] | Train Loss: 0.3273, Train Acc: 0.8488 | Test Loss: 0.6210, Test Acc: 0.7427 Epoch [200/300] | Train Loss: 0.3175, Train Acc: 0.8558 | Test Loss: 0.6753, Test Acc: 0.7007 Epoch [220/300] | Train Loss: 0.3103, Train Acc: 0.8628 | Test Loss: 0.6701, Test Acc: 0.7233 Epoch [240/300] | Train Loss: 0.3035, Train Acc: 0.8618 | Test Loss: 0.6862, Test Acc: 0.7060 Epoch [260/300] | Train Loss: 0.2984, Train Acc: 0.8628 | Test Loss: 0.7258, Test Acc: 0.7120 Epoch [280/300] | Train Loss: 0.2891, Train Acc: 0.8730 | Test Loss: 0.7432, Test Acc: 0.7213 Epoch [300/300] | Train Loss: 0.2828, Train Acc: 0.8750 | Test Loss: 0.7428, Test Acc: 0.7220 Final Test Accuracy: 0.7220

三、可视化

下图左侧展示损失曲线,右侧展示准确率曲线。

epochs=range(1,num_epochs+1)fig,axes=plt.subplots(1,2,figsize=(14,5))axes[0].plot(epochs,train_losses,label='Train Loss')axes[0].plot(epochs,test_losses,label='Test Loss')axes[0].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[0].set_ylabel('Loss')axes[0].set_title('Train vs Test Loss')axes[0].legend()axes[1].plot(epochs,train_accuracies,label='Train Acc')axes[1].plot(epochs,test_accuracies,label='Test Acc')axes[1].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[1].set_ylabel('Accuracy')axes[1].set_title('Train vs Test Accuracy')axes[1].legend()plt.tight_layout()plt.show()


可以看到,模型在测试集上的表现极差。过拟合很严重。接下来,我们来尝试使用Dropout来减缓过拟合。

# 使用 Dropout + L2 正则重新训练,缓解过拟合set_seed(42)# 确保第二次实验也可复现drop_model=nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(X_train.shape[1],128),nn.ReLU(),nn.Dropout(0.3),nn.Linear(128,64),nn.ReLU(),nn.Dropout(0.3),nn.Linear(64,1)).to(device)weight_decay=1e-4drop_optimizer=optim.Adam(drop_model.parameters(),lr=1e-3,weight_decay=weight_decay)drop_epochs=200drop_train_losses,drop_test_losses=[],[]drop_train_accs,drop_test_accs=[],[]forepochinrange(1,drop_epochs+1):drop_model.train()running_loss=0.0running_correct=0total=0forxb,ybintrain_loader:xb=xb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)yb=yb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)drop_optimizer.zero_grad()logits=drop_model(xb)loss=criterion(logits,yb)loss.backward()drop_optimizer.step()running_loss+=loss.item()*xb.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(logits)>0.5).int()running_correct+=(preds==yb.int()).sum().item()total+=xb.size(0)train_loss=running_loss/total train_acc=running_correct/total drop_train_losses.append(train_loss)drop_train_accs.append(train_acc)drop_model.eval()test_loss=0.0test_correct=0total_test=0withtorch.no_grad():forxb,ybintest_loader:xb=xb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)yb=yb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)logits=drop_model(xb)loss=criterion(logits,yb)test_loss+=loss.item()*xb.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(logits)>0.5).int()test_correct+=(preds==yb.int()).sum().item()total_test+=xb.size(0)avg_test_loss=test_loss/total_test avg_test_acc=test_correct/total_test drop_test_losses.append(avg_test_loss)drop_test_accs.append(avg_test_acc)ifepoch%20==0orepoch==1:print(f'Dropout Epoch [{epoch:03d}/{drop_epochs}] | 'f'Train Loss:{train_loss:.4f}, Train Acc:{train_acc:.4f}| 'f'Test Loss:{avg_test_loss:.4f}, Test Acc:{avg_test_acc:.4f}')print(f'Final Test Accuracy with Dropout/L2:{drop_test_accs[-1]:.4f}')
Dropout Epoch [001/200] | Train Loss: 0.5564, Train Acc: 0.7473 | Test Loss: 0.4935, Test Acc: 0.7667 Dropout Epoch [020/200] | Train Loss: 0.4507, Train Acc: 0.7858 | Test Loss: 0.4711, Test Acc: 0.7647 Dropout Epoch [040/200] | Train Loss: 0.4392, Train Acc: 0.7872 | Test Loss: 0.4743, Test Acc: 0.7620 Dropout Epoch [060/200] | Train Loss: 0.4284, Train Acc: 0.7978 | Test Loss: 0.4817, Test Acc: 0.7593 Dropout Epoch [080/200] | Train Loss: 0.4182, Train Acc: 0.8008 | Test Loss: 0.4826, Test Acc: 0.7553 Dropout Epoch [100/200] | Train Loss: 0.4133, Train Acc: 0.8065 | Test Loss: 0.4929, Test Acc: 0.7547 Dropout Epoch [120/200] | Train Loss: 0.4085, Train Acc: 0.8067 | Test Loss: 0.4951, Test Acc: 0.7533 Dropout Epoch [140/200] | Train Loss: 0.3974, Train Acc: 0.8135 | Test Loss: 0.5040, Test Acc: 0.7580 Dropout Epoch [160/200] | Train Loss: 0.3925, Train Acc: 0.8173 | Test Loss: 0.5158, Test Acc: 0.7533 Dropout Epoch [180/200] | Train Loss: 0.3872, Train Acc: 0.8178 | Test Loss: 0.5231, Test Acc: 0.7533 Dropout Epoch [200/200] | Train Loss: 0.3828, Train Acc: 0.8220 | Test Loss: 0.5193, Test Acc: 0.7480 Final Test Accuracy with Dropout/L2: 0.7480

Dropout 模型表现

再绘制一次损失/准确率曲线,观察正则化后的收敛情况。

drop_epochs_range=range(1,drop_epochs+1)fig,axes=plt.subplots(1,2,figsize=(14,5))axes[0].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_train_losses,label='Drop Train Loss')axes[0].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_test_losses,label='Drop Test Loss')axes[0].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[0].set_ylabel('Loss')axes[0].set_title('Dropout Model Loss')axes[0].legend()axes[1].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_train_accs,label='Drop Train Acc')axes[1].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_test_accs,label='Drop Test Acc')axes[1].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[1].set_ylabel('Accuracy')axes[1].set_title('Dropout Model Accuracy')axes[1].legend()plt.tight_layout()plt.show()

四、小结

  • 我天,效果更差了。(ㄒ o ㄒ)
  • 第一阶段模型有明显的过拟合迹象,因此又用 Dropout + L2 重新训练,记录了第二组损失/准确率曲线。结果效果更差了(。ŏ﹏ŏ)。本人才疏学浅,先这样吧,之后再来研究一下是为啥吧。
  • 之后继续在正则化、网络深度、学习率调度或早停等方向尝试。

@浙大疏锦行

版权声明: 本文来自互联网用户投稿,该文观点仅代表作者本人,不代表本站立场。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如若内容造成侵权/违法违规/事实不符,请联系邮箱:809451989@qq.com进行投诉反馈,一经查实,立即删除!
网站建设 2026/7/4 6:08:06

jQuery 尺寸

jQuery 尺寸 引言 jQuery 是一个广泛使用的 JavaScript 库,它极大地简化了 HTML 文档遍历、事件处理、动画和 Ajax 操作等操作。在开发中,有时我们需要获取元素的大小,jQuery 提供了一系列方法来实现这一功能。本文将详细介绍 jQuery 中与尺寸相关的方法,帮助开发者更好地…

作者头像 李华
网站建设 2026/7/3 13:18:53

从SP到BP战略规划与解码全流程(华为案例)

华为公司能持续穿越产业周期、在多个领域取得全球领先地位&#xff0c;其核心引擎之一是一套严谨、闭环、动态迭代的战略管理体系。 这套体系的核心&#xff0c;即是从3-5年战略规划&#xff08;SP&#xff09;向年度业务计划&#xff08;BP&#xff09;的高质量解码与落地过程…

作者头像 李华
网站建设 2026/7/5 0:30:14

XML Schema 元素

XML Schema 元素 XML Schema 是一种用来定义 XML 文档结构的语言。它是 XML 文档类型定义(DTD)的替代品,提供了更强大和灵活的机制来描述 XML 文档的结构和内容。本文将详细探讨 XML Schema 中的元素,并解释它们在构建 XML 文档中的作用。 1. XML Schema 基础 在深入讨论…

作者头像 李华
网站建设 2026/7/2 10:35:55

MobaXterm:运维高手的终极利器

MobaXterm&#xff1a;高效运维实战指南 - 技术文章大纲一、 引言运维工程师的痛点&#xff1a;远程管理、多协议支持、文件传输、效率工具MobaXterm 简介&#xff1a;一体化网络工具集All-in-One 解决方案 (SSH, X11, RDP, VNC, Telnet, FTP, SFTP, ...)开源免费版与专业版的区…

作者头像 李华
网站建设 2026/7/4 3:50:36

微信小程序开发实战之 03-微信小程序页面交互

微信小程序框架接口 App 函数 在微信小程序中&#xff0c;若要在微信小程序启动、显示、隐藏时执行某些操作&#xff0c;或者在各个页面中需要共享一些数据时&#xff0c;可以通过 App 函数来实现。 App 函数用于注册一个微信小程序&#xff0c;该函数必须在 微信小程序入口文件…

作者头像 李华